Legal Opinion

Land Title Bk. and Tr. Co. v. Freas, Admrx.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1938No. Appeals, 233 and 234PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

After a default occurred in the payment of the principal, interest and taxes due under a mortgage debt, a mortgagee agreed in writing to accept the payment of interest “past and future” at the rate of 4.8% instead of at the previously stipulated rate of 6%. Interest on the mortgage which became due after the execution of the agreement was paid at the rate of 4.8%. This state of facts gives rise to the question: Did such action by the mortgagee release a gratuitous surety who has given a collateral bond for the payment of a portion of the mortgage debt?

The matter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Plummer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Killeen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Manufacturers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  4. Coltraro v. LotusoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias v. State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aliquippa National Bank v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Yulsman v. DuboisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Lundvall v. Camp Hill School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1972
  4. Rubinoff v. Rubinoff, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API