Legal Opinion

United States v. Lai Chew

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 19, 1924No. Nos. 12997, 13934, 14168PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERRIGAN, District Judge.

In each of these cases the petitioner claims that the search 'warrants by virtue of which his premises were searched and certain opium obtained were defective, in that no probable cause had been shown in the affidavit used as a basis for the issuance of the warrant, and that the warrant itself contained no finding of the existence of probable cause by the United States Commissioner who issued the same. The affidavits are substantially the same in each case, so I will only quote that contained in the Wong Wing Wo Case. It is as follows:

“J. W. Smith, being first duly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  3. United States v. MarescaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  4. People Ex Rel. Robert Simpson Co. v. KempnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. United States v. TureaudU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen v. Lindbeck, Justice of the PeaceUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. United States v. GervatoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. United States v. Office No. 508 Ricou-Brewster Bldg.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1954
  5. Pappas v. LufkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API