Legal Opinion

Application of Sidney Dilnot

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 13, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6774PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office regarding appel lant’s application for a patent on “Light Weight Aerated Concrete.” Six claims reciting a method of making this material were allowed by the examiner. The sole issue is the patentability of article claims 10-13 and 20 in view of the Fraser patent, Re. 23,228, issued May 9, 1950.

Claim 10. is representative and reads as follows:

“10. An article of manufacture comprising a form retaining self sustaining body of indurated, dense calcium silicate hydrate matrix, said body…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of ShortellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  2. In Re MoellerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  3. Application of LiftonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Application of Anthony L. GarneroCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Application of Joseph F. Stephens, Eugene F. Wenzl and Mervin F. BrowneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Application of Lionel Alexander Bethune PilkingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Application of James R. JohnsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API