Application of Sidney Dilnot
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office regarding appel lant’s application for a patent on “Light Weight Aerated Concrete.” Six claims reciting a method of making this material were allowed by the examiner. The sole issue is the patentability of article claims 10-13 and 20 in view of the Fraser patent, Re. 23,228, issued May 9, 1950.
Claim 10. is representative and reads as follows:
“10. An article of manufacture comprising a form retaining self sustaining body of indurated, dense calcium silicate hydrate matrix, said body…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of ShortellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In Re MoellerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Application of LiftonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Application of Anthony L. GarneroCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Joseph F. Stephens, Eugene F. Wenzl and Mervin F. BrowneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Lionel Alexander Bethune PilkingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of James R. JohnsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.