Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Application of Anthony L. Garnero

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 26, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8172PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This appeal is from the Patent Office Board of Appeals decision affirming the examiner’s rejection of two claims 1 of appellant’s application 2 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 103, claim 1 being rejected on Thomas 3 in view of Pierce 4 and claim 9 being rejected on the same combination of references further in view of Ford. 5 No claim has been allowed.

THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a thermal insulation panel formed from expanded perlite particles. The particles are held together without any additional material, such as an external bonding agent, by interfusion between…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Joseph F. Stephens, Eugene F. Wenzl and Mervin F. BrowneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Sidney DilnotCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Hartmut Steppan, August Rebenstock and Wilhelm NeugebauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Application of Anthony L. GarneroCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AGA Medical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Gemtron Corp. v. Saint-Gobain Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. R2 Medical Systems, Inc. v. Katecho, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Biacore, AB v. Thermo Bioanalysis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API