Legal Opinion
In Re Moeller
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 24, 1941No. Patent Appeal 4422PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
Appellant filed an application in the United States Patent Office relating to improvements in molded cement products and the method of and apparatus for manufacturing the same, which improvements particularly pertain to asbestos cement compositions.
The Primary Examiner, after allowing 17 claims, finally rejected claims 1, 7, 15 to 19, 21, 26 and 27. Upon appeal, the Board of Appeals affirmed the examiner as to the rejection of claims 17, 18, 26 and 27, but reversed the examiner as to claims 1, 7, 15, 16, 19 and 21. Thus, appellant’s present application contains 23…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re MerzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Bituminous Products Co. v. Headley Good Roads Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1924
- In Re ButlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- In re BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Application of Lionel Alexander Bethune PilkingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of LiftonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.