Legal Opinion

State v. Williamson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1968No. 8264PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARMIJO, Judge, Court of Appeals.

Appellants, Larry and Carl Williamson, appeal from their convictions of Armed Robbery, contrary to § 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A. (1953), and Kidnapping contrary to § 40A-4-1, N.M.S.A. (1953).

During the evening of February 5, 1966, an Armed Robbery and Kidnapping was committed within a residence in Carlsbad. The two persons committing the crimes entered the residence wearing nylon stockings and pieces of a towel to conceal their identity, and also wore army fatigue caps, coveralls, and were armed with a pistol and a metal bar. The victims of the above crimes will…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Chester Nelson v. People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. BurdexNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API