Grantham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*662OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of the offense of attempted capital murder and the punishment was assessed at twenty (20) years in the Texas Department of Corrections. On direct appeal the conviction was affirmed. Grantham v. State, 751 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth, 1988). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review in which he contends, inter alia, that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that he had not preserved error and that he had not shown harm. In determining whether appellant had been harmed by the inclusion of this charge,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Grantham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988