Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Pennock Insurance Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1987No. 1041PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the trial court sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections to appellants’ original complaint and dismissing counts two, three and four of that complaint. We must first address whether this Court has proper jurisdiction to entertain appellants’ issues on appeal.

*210Appellants contend in their Statement of Jurisdiction that this appeal is properly taken from the order of the lower court dismissing three causes of action. Appellants aver that all three dismissals are final and appealable orders as set forth by this Court in Cloverleaf Development,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Pekular v. EichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Raab v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Cloverleaf Development, Inc. v. Horizon Financial F.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Romano v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Valley Forge Towers South Condominium v. Ron-Ike Foam Insulators, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API