Legal Opinion

United States v. 36 Drums of Pop'n Oil

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1947No. 11917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*251HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to a libel filed by the United States, thirty-six drums of mineral oil, under the trade name of Pop’n-Oil, were seized and held in the custody of the Marshal, pending further orders of the court below respecting the same. The libel of information alleged that said oil was adulterated within the meaning of Section 342 (b) (2), (b) (3), and (b) (4), Title 21, of the United States Code, Annotated, and that it was also misbranded within the meaning of Section 343(b) of said code. After a trial upon the merits, the court vacated the seizure, ordered possession of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. DiMeglioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. United States v. 651 CASES, ETC.District Court, N.D. New York · 1953
  4. United States v. 716 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Del Comida Brand TomatoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API