Legal Opinion
State v. Cripps
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1995No. C9-93-2197PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Defendant, Heidi Anna Cripps, was drinking alcohol in a Mankato, Minnesota bar when a police officer approached her and asked to see her identification. Cripps gave the officer a false identification and she was arrested. Cripps was charged for using another’s name and date of birth to a police officer, for displaying another’s driver’s license, and for consuming alcohol while under the age of 21. Cripps moved to suppress all evidence obtained after the officer first approached her in the bar and asked to see identification. The trial court denied Cripps’ motion to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. FortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.