Legal Opinion

Jeremiah Ethan Samuel Shull v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2017No. S-16-0046PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] Appellant Jeremiah Shull used a knife to kill a man he found in bed with his wife, and a jury convicted him of first degree murder. We reverse and remand for a new trial due to instructional error.

ISSUES

[¶2] Shull raises four issues, all of which relate to his position at trial that the killing was not premeditated murder, but rather the lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter. 1 We rearrange and, for the sake of clarity, slightly reword those issues as follows:

I. Did the jury instructions create reversible error as to the lesser included offense of voluntary…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Farrow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Schmuck v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Anthony Haire v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API