Legal Opinion
Pruidze v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 3, 2011No. 09-3836PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
The Board of Immigration Appeals interprets a regulation promulgated by the Attorney General to provide that the Board lacks jurisdiction to review a motion to reopen once an alien leaves the United States, whether voluntarily or involuntarily. Yet the statute that empowers the Board to consider motions to reopen says nothing about jurisdictional limitations of any kind, let alone this kind. Because this regulatory interpretation has no roots in any statutory source and misapprehends the authority delegated to the Board by Congress, the Board’s order disclaiming…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Luna v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- City of Arlington v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Contreras-Bocanegra v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Maribel Trujillo Diaz v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.