Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BYBEE;
Concurrence by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Concurrence by Judge GOULD; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge PAEZ.
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
In National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Services, the Supreme Court instructed federal courts to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes, even when those interpretations conflict with the prior holding of a federal circuit court. 545 U.S. 967, 982-83, 125 S.Ct. 2688, 162 L.Ed.2d 820 (2005). That is the situation we confront…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Leslie Woods v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Karen Lambert v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Gutierrez-Brizuela v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Teresita Ching v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.