Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1949 Chevrolet Coach

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 29, 1951No. Civ. No. 5081PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, District Judge.

Proceeding by the United States against one 1949 Chevrolet Tudor Sedan, Motor No. GAA 953083, to forfeit the automobile for an alleged violation of the internal revenue law which requires payment of a special tax by retail liquor dealers. The Associates Discount Corporation intervened, claiming a lien upon the automobile.

The United States of America filed a libel of information seeking the forfeiture of the automobile described above. The libel alleged that the automobile was used in violation of Title 26 U.S.C.A. § 3253 and was subject to forfeiture under Title 26…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. WindleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  3. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe CoachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. Automobile Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  5. Federal Motor Finance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. One 1951 Chevrolet Delivery SedanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API