Legal Opinion

City of Alexandria v. Viering

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1929No. 27,206PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appealed from a judgment.

The criminal complaint filed with a justice of the peace accused defendant of maintaining a nuisance in relation to intoxicating liquor “contrary to section 2 of Ordinance No. 35 of the City of Alexandria, Douglas County, Minnesota, and against the form of the statute in such case made and provided.” Defendant was convicted, and he appealed to the district court on questions of law only and the conviction was affirmed.

The contention is that the complaint is not sufficient to warrant a conviction because (1) it is indefinite and does not inform the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Jordan v. NicolinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Village of Minneota v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. State v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. City of Faribault v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Village of Fairmont v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Alexandria v. VieringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API