City of Jordan v. Nicolin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Scott county, Cadwell, J., affirming a judgment of a justice of the peace before whom defendant was convicted of the offense of keeping open his saloon in violation of an ordinance of plaintiff city.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant was convicted in justice court of the offense of keeping his saloon open after eleven o’clock at night, contrary to the ordinance of the city of Jordan. He appealed from the judgment of the district court of the county of Scott upon questions of law alone. Judgment was entered in the district court affirming the judgment of the justice court, and the defendant appealed therefrom to this court.
The assignments of error raised the question of the validity of the ordinance by virtue of which the defendant was convicted. The city council of the city of Jordan has full power to impose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. LudwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
3Cited by12 opinions
- Evans v. City of Redwood FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- State v. MarciniakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- City of Virginia v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State v. HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.