City of Faribault v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
' Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Eice county.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
The charter of the city of Faribault (Sp. Laws 1872, c. 11, subc. 3, § 3, subd. 9, p. 108, as amended by Sp. Laws 1878, c. 27, § 3, p. 243) authorizes the council “to regulate or prevent the running at large of dogs, to require license for keeping the same, and impose a fee for such license and a tax upon dogs, and authorize the destruction of the same in a summary manner when not licensed, or when at large contrary to the ordinance.” The "council passed an ordinance containing these provisions: “Section 1. That any dog, bitch, or slut, or any animal of the dog kind, owned by or being in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blair v. ForehandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Mitchell v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Carter v. DowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- State v. GraffmullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Village of Litchville v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Griggs v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Incorporated Town of Sibley v. LastricoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Kidd v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.