Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Flynn

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1951No. Civ. 17998PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, P. J.—

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rejecting his demand for a declaration of his rights under a property settlement agreement which was subsequently approved and incorporated in the interlocutory decree of divorce entered at the suit of the wife, respondent herein. By his second amended complaint in the instant action appellant alleged that a controversy existed between himself and respondent relative to the meaning of their agreement which provided for monthly payments of $1,500 for maintenance and support aggregating $18,000 annually * and, in anticipation of a possible change…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bradley Co. v. RidgewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Putnam v. PutnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Colberg, Inc. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Lunsford v. KosankeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Tringham v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API