Legal Opinion

AdvanceMe, Inc. v. Finley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 8, 2005No. A05A1098PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

In this case seeking recovery of loaned funds, AdvanceMe, Inc. appeals the grant of summary judgment entered against it and in favor of Constance Finley. Because AdvanceMe has failed to demonstrate that Finley was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Latson v. BoazSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Boles v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Aycock v. CalkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Williams v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. All Tech Co. v. Laimer Unicon, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Shannon v. Office Max North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. H. J. Wings & Wings v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Long v. NatarajanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Tullis Developments, Inc. v. 3M Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API