Legal Opinion
Pusti v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1964No. Appeal, 317PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen,
John J. Pusti, Jr. purchased four automobile collision policies from appellant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide) in 1958. All were purchased through the same agent and were identical. Each policy covered a separate automobile owned by him. For an additional five dollar premium, each policy had attached to it a family compensation rider. Under that rider, Nationwide agreed to pay, irrespective of fault, scheduled benefit amounts for bodily injury, sickness, or death caused by an automobile to the following classes of persons: (Part A) to any person…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Southwestern Fire and Casualty Company v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Central Surety & Insurance Corporation v. ElderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Kansas City Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. EppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bishop v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Frank v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Equibank v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Varvil v. M.F.A. Mutual Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. Export-Import Bank of the United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.