Legal Opinion

Stieneke v. Russi

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 1, 2008No. 35505-1-IIPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Penoyar, A.C.J.

¶1 Shortly after the Stienekes took possession of their Gig Harbor home in April 2003, the roof began to leak, causing damage to the home’s interior. The Stienekes claimed that prior to closing, the home’s previous owner, Russi, orally assured them that he had not had any problems with the roof when, in fact, he had experienced several roof leaks during the course of his ownership of the home. The Stienekes also claimed that Russi misrepresented the roof’s history in a seller disclosure statement he completed and signed prior to closing. In reliance on Russi’s oral…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Carlile v. Harbour Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Carlile v. Harbour Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Washington Federal v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Jackson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Jackson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API