Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Bodvin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1951No. 31417PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

The principal beneficiaries under the will of Peter Bodvin, deceased, filed a petition in this probate pro ceeding, asking in effect that the executor be required to include additional assets in the inventory of the estate, that he be discharged as executor, and that he be required to show cause why this relief should not be granted. An order to show cause was duly issued. The matter came on for hearing, at the close of which the trial court announced that the relief prayed for would be denied. Petitioners then filed a motion for reopening and continuance, and argument was had on this'…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pope v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  2. Gephart v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. In RE GENSBURG v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. McCoy v. CourtneyWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re Rockwood BoulevardWashington Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ferris v. BlumhardtWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Kirkpatrick v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Holohan v. MelvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In Re Beard's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API