Legal Opinion

Schluckebier v. Arlington Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

Respondent is the owner of a farm in the town of Burke, Dane county. Effective January 1, 1957, appellant issued a standard town mutual policy insuring respondent’s farm property against damage or loss resulting from fire and lightning. In the policy a barn was insured in the amount of $16,000. Attached to the original policy is a supplemental coverage indorsement providing:

“In consideration of the premium charged, and subject to provisions and stipulations (hereinafter referred to as ‘provisions’) herein and in the policy to which this Supplemental Coverage is attached, including riders and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Merritt v. Great Northern Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Concordia Fire Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cuna v. Board of Fire CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. Milwaukee Gas Light Co. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Plevin v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API