Legal Opinion

Eileen Kay Thomas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1968No. 23348_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Circuit Judge:

This criminal appeal presents two questions: (1) whether an impermissible amendment to the indictment was effected by the action of the trial court in striking, on motion of the government, portions of Count One, and in dismissing Count Three of the Indictment; and (2) whether the verdict of guilty is supported by the evidence.

The Indictment returned October 21, 1965, charged appellant Eileen Kay Thomas, and two other defendants, William John Tehoy, III, and Paul Willough-by Granville, in Count One with conspiracy under Title 18, U.S.C. Sec. 371, to violate the Bank…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. United States v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Oscar E. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. David Hall and W. W. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Harold DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,293 United States of America v. Lewis L. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API