Legal Opinion

Duke University v. Stainback

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1987No. 8614SC542PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Plaintiff, Duke University Medical Center (Duke) sought to recover medical expenses for services rendered to Robert L. Stainback, Jr., from his parents, Robert L. and Elizabeth Stain-back, and their insurer, Investor’s Consolidated Insurance Com*76pany (Investor’s). The trial judge found Robert L. Stainback liable for the entire balance due, notwithstanding that the statute of limitations may have run against Duke’s claim, because Stainback was equitably estopped from pleading the statute of limitations as a bar. Stainback appeals. We affirm.

I

Robert L. Stainback, Jr. was admitted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Harris v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  2. WRI/Raleigh, L.P. v. ShaikhCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. In re Will of McFaydenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Hughes v. Rivera-OrtizCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Hendrix v. ADVANCED METAL CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API