Legal Opinion

Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. Surratt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1973No. 7326DC716PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

There being no genuine issue as to any material fact, the only question which we must resolve on this appeal is whether plaintiff, as a matter of law, is entitled to contribution from the defendant. A basic prerequisite to plaintiff’s right of contribution is that there be joint tort liability. G.S. 1B-I(a); Pearsall v. Power Co., 258 N.C. 639, 129 S.E. 2d 217 (1962); Wise v. Vincent and Stronach v. Vincent, 265 N.C. 647, 144 S.E. 2d 877 (1965); Clemmons v. King, 265 N.C. 199, 143 S.E. 2d 83 (1965). In the former action instituted by Springs, plaintiff’s insureds and Barbara…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Clemmons v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Wise v. VincentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taveney v. International Paper CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API