Legal Opinion
Wise v. Vincent
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 24, 1965No. 357PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The first question raised is whether original defendant Vincent states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for contribution against additional defendant Jones.
The applicable rules of law are stated in Hayes v. Wilmington, 243 N.C. 525, 91 S.E. 2d 673, as follows:
“1. Liability for contribution under the provisions of G.S. 1-240 may not be invoked except among joint tortfeasors. Therefore, in order for one defendant to join another as a third-party defendant for the purpose of contribution, he must allege facts sufficient to show joint tortfeasorship and his right to contribution…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Freeman v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Clark v. ScheldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Dunlap v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Slade Ex Rel. Slade v. New Hanover County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Murphy v. Edwards and WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. SurrattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Martin v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1982