Legal Opinion

Matter of Bagdalik v. Flexlume Corp., State Ins. Fund

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed and claim dismissed, with costs in all courts. The employee’s work in Chicago makes applicable the rule laid down in Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co. (252 N. Y. 394). No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Claim of Rutledge v. Al. G. Kelly & Miller Bros. CircusNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Claim of Bauss v. Consolidated Chimney Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Claim of Cradduck v. Hallen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Claim of Adams v. Max Solomon Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  5. Claim of Baduski v. S. Gumpert Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API