Legal Opinion
Claim of Cradduck v. Hallen Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loughran, Ch. J.
In this workmen’s compensation case, the appellants are an employer and its insurance carrier. They challenge an award which the New York Workmen’s Compensation Board made to the claimant Robert Cradduck for injuries sustained by him at a time when he was working in the State of Indiana. The board found, however, that Cradduck’s employment at that time was located in the State of New York. Whether there is evidence sufficient to sustain that finding is the question to be determined.
In a memorandum of its decision, the board summarized the facts in this way: ‘ ‘ The claimant, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Matter of Amaxis v. N.A. Vassilaros, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Zeltoski v. Osborne Drilling CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Claim of the Industrial Commissioner v. Underwood Elliott Fisher Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Roth v. A.C. Horn CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Lewis v. Knappen Tippetts Abbett Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Claim of Nashko v. Standard Water Proofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Claim of Rutledge v. Al. G. Kelly & Miller Bros. CircusNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Tuffarella v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Claim of Shorr v. U-Wanna-Wash Frocks, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.