Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoyts Cinemas Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 31, 2003No. CIV.A. 00-12567-WGYPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
This case concerns stadium-style movie theaters and the seating to which wheelchair-bound people have access. The Government has brought suit against two major movie theater chains, charging that certain of their movie theaters deny wheelchair-bound people access to stadium-style seats.
Specifically, the Government has brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 12188(b)(1)(B) against National Amusements, Inc. (“National Amusements”) and Hoyts Cinemas Corporation (“Hoyts”), (collectively “the Cinemas”), alleging that the Cinemas are in violation of Title III of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Cinemark Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Hoyts Cinemas Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Washington State Communication Access Project v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.