Legal Opinion
Hale v. Walsh
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 1987No. 14927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UPON REHEARING, THE OPINION OF THE COURT ISSUED MAY 6, 1986, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.
THIS OPINION IS SUBSTITUTED.
SWANSTROM, Judge.
Thomas and Margaret Hale sought equitable relief and damages against officials of Idaho State University (ISU) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after Thomas Hale’s employment as a teacher was terminated. The Hales claimed that he had been “fired” for exercising his constitutional right of freedom of speech and association. After a trial, the jury found Robert Edington (Dean of the College of Liberal Arts) and ISU Assistant Vice President Walsh had deprived Hale of his first…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Continental Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Dufur v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hughes v. Idaho State UniversityIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. Continental Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Jarman v. HaleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.