Dufur v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Before this Court are two appeals original ing from the same civil action. In the district court, George C. and Loma G. Dufur, husband and wife, sought a declaration that the statutory procedures used by the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (Irrigation District) to foreclose on the Dufurs’ real property were unconstitutional. The Dufurs sought recovery of their real property, damages, costs and attorney fees. In case no. 21377, the Dufurs appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and the Private Attorney…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- William v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Jim & Maryann Plane Family Trust v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- G. Lance Salladay v. Eric BowenIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Anadarko Land Corporation F/K/A Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation, and Three Sisters, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company v. Family Tree Corporation, a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Anadarko Land Corporation F/K/A Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation, and Three Sisters, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company v. Family Tree Corporation, a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.