Legal Opinion

Owens v. Cupp

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1985No. TC 143,980; CA A33329; SC S32044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*160MEMORANDUM OPINION

In 1981, petitioner was convicted of robbery and kidnapping and, after his probation for a previous offense was revoked, he was sentenced. Upon appeal, petitioner’s convictions and sentences were affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 58 Or App 739, 650 P2d 124 (1982). No petition for review was filed with this court.

In 1983, petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief wherein petitioner made three claims: (1) that his sentences were not properly imposed; (2) that he had ineffective trial counsel; and (3) that he had ineffective appellate counsel. The matter was argued…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leahy v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API