Legal Opinion
Joseph Schenfeld v. Norton Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1968No. 9386_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
Appellant Joseph Schenfeld was injured in the course of his employment with Western Foundries, Inc., when a grinding wheel he was using flew into pieces, one or more of which struck him in the face. The wheel was mounted on a power grinder by means of a metal mount. Schenfeld brought suit against appellee Norton Company (the manufacturer and supplier of both the grinding wheel and metal mount), alleging: (1) breach of an implied warranty that the grinding wheel was in all respects fit> proper and safe to be .used when mounted in the manner in which it was, and (2)…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Berg v. StrommeWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Boris S. Browzin v. Catholic University of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Fernon D. Marshall v. Ford Motor Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.