National Texture Corp. v. Hymes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of Henne-pin County District Court, denying various post-trial motions, including defendant Richard Hymes’ motion for disqualification of plaintiff National Texture Corporation’s counsel, and from the district court’s judgment, holding that National Texture Corporation is the owner of U. S. Patent No. 3,897,577, covering roll-on texture, that Hymes shall assign it to the company, and that Hymes’ counterclaim should be dismissed. We reverse and remand.
The questions presented by this appeal are:
1. Did the trial court err in denying Hymes’ motion to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Novo Terapeutisk Laboratorium A/s v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Gist-Brocades Fermentation Industries, Inc., and Gist-Brocades N. V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Keith B. Redd, D/B/A Abajo Petroleum v. Shell Oil Company, in the Matter of Michael W. Graney, Attorney for Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Humphrey on Behalf of State v. McLarenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Dennie v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.