Legal Opinion · Dissent

Landon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 30, 1952No. 22285_1Published

1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge

I dissent solely with respect to the allowance in the plaintiff’s damages of the total amount of his weekly wages during disability as loss of earnings. My reasons follow.

No more than my colleagues do I like the unpopular doctrine of Drinkwater v. Dinsmore, 80 N.Y. 390.1 But the doctrine we, as federal judges, think desirable is here as irrelevant as our private choices of odors or poems; .for the Federal Tort Claims Act requires us, in matters affecting substantially the outcome of the litigation, to apply the New York decisional rule, whatever it may be.

My colleagues have not shown that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drinkwater v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. United States v. Gaidys Et Ux. Gaidys v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Calhoun v. West End Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Dimeglio v. Slonk Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  5. Dimeglio v. Slonk Construction CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API