Legal Opinion

Dimeglio v. Slonk Construction Company

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 21, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Young v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Landon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Portnoff v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Montgomery v. Abex Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  5. Torres v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API