Legal Opinion
Dimeglio v. Slonk Construction Company
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 21, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Young v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Landon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Portnoff v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Montgomery v. Abex Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Torres v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.