Legal Opinion

Dimeglio v. Slonk Construction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 22, 1938PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

This case arose under the Workmen’s Compensation act of 1911, as amended. Pamph. L. 1911, pp. 134, 763; B. S. 1937, 34:15-1 et seq.

Conceded^, the employe suffered a compensable injury on October 4th, 1934. He was obliged to cease work immediately. The employer provided medical service for approximately one year; and, on the mistaken supposition that the employe’s weekly wage was $25, voluntarily rendered com pensation at the weekly rate of $16.67, for temporary disability over a period of sixteen weeks and permanent incapacity to the extent of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Young v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. SieglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Landon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co. v. BlauNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Hajnas v. Engelhard Min. & Chem. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API