Legal Opinion · Dissent

Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc. v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 11, 1990No. 89-1499Published

1DissentPauline Newman, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the court’s affirmation of the summary judgment that Terry Haggerty Tire Co. was the “importer” of certain tires into the United States. In determining who, as between Terry Haggerty and Canada Tire, was the importer for the purpose of excise tax liability, the Claims Court resolved disputed material facts against the non-movant. I believe that the Claims Court erred not only procedurally, but also in its conclusion that Canada Tire’s role in bringing the tires into the United States was simply as a broker or agent of Terry Haggerty.

DISCUSSION

The applicable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Handley Motor Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Import Wholesalers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Import Wholesalers Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Corex Corporation, Dba Quick Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Sony Corporation of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API