Corex Corporation, Dba Quick Corporation of America v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CARTER, HUFSTEDLER and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves a refund suit brought by the Corex Corporation (“Corex”) for money paid pursuant to an excise tax assessment under Section 4161 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 4161. The United States brought a counterclaim for other unpaid excise taxes. Section 4161 imposes upon the sale of fishing gear by the manufacturer, producer, or importer a tax equivalent to ten percent of the price for which it is sold by the taxpayer.
Following a nonjury trial, findings of fact and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Armature Rewinding Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Import Wholesalers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Import Wholesalers Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Sony Corporation of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Sony Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Corex Corporation, D/B/A Quick Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990