Legal Opinion

Corex Corporation, Dba Quick Corporation of America v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1975No. 73-3332PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CARTER, HUFSTEDLER and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves a refund suit brought by the Corex Corporation (“Corex”) for money paid pursuant to an excise tax assessment under Section 4161 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 4161. The United States brought a counterclaim for other unpaid excise taxes. Section 4161 imposes upon the sale of fishing gear by the manufacturer, producer, or importer a tax equivalent to ten percent of the price for which it is sold by the taxpayer.

Following a nonjury trial, findings of fact and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Armature Rewinding Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  2. Import Wholesalers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Import Wholesalers Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Sony Corporation of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Sony Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corex Corporation, D/B/A Quick Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API