Legal Opinion
North Dallas Diagnostic Center v. Dewberry
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided April 13, 1995No. 05-92-00489-CVPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Justice.
In this medical malpractice action, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion in allowing an expert to testify on causation without a showing that the expert’s opinion was based on valid and well-grounded scientific knowledge. A jury found appellant North Dallas Diagnostic Center (the Center) liable for injuries sustained by appel-lee Jacqueline Riley Dewberry after she was injected with a contrast dye. On appeal, the Center raises eleven points of error challenging the trial court’s judgment.
We conclude the testimony of Dewberry’s expert…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Allison v. Fire Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Purina Mills, Inc. v. Odell, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- Malone v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Waring v. Wommack, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.