Corley v. Parson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
At issue in this appeal is the proper construction to be given certain language in a deed. The pertinent part of the deed is set out here, with the normal type representing the words of the printed form; the italicized words representing those handwritten; and the stricken words representing those printed words struck by the maker’s pen.. . [P]arty of the first part. . . does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said party of the second part his heirs and assigns, all that tract or parcel of land [description follows] ... It is hereby understood and agreed between the party…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Collinsville Granite Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Franks v. SparksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Floral Hills Memory Gardens, Inc. v. RobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Moseley v. PattilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hardman v. Dahlonega-Lumpkin County Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Buttars v. ButtarsUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Corley v. ParsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976