Legal Opinion

Corley v. Parson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1975No. 29582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

At issue in this appeal is the proper construction to be given certain language in a deed. The pertinent part of the deed is set out here, with the normal type representing the words of the printed form; the italicized words representing those handwritten; and the stricken words representing those printed words struck by the maker’s pen.. . [P]arty of the first part. . . does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said party of the second part his heirs and assigns, all that tract or parcel of land [description follows] ... It is hereby understood and agreed between the party…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collinsville Granite Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Franks v. SparksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Floral Hills Memory Gardens, Inc. v. RobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. Moseley v. PattilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardman v. Dahlonega-Lumpkin County Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Buttars v. ButtarsUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Corley v. ParsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API