Legal Opinion

Forncrook v. Root

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 23, 1888No. 225PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL' FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF. OHIO. In equity to restrain alleged infringements of letters-patent. Decree dismissing the bill. Complainant appealed. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatohford

■ This is a suit in equity, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, by James Forncrook against Amos I. Boot, for the infringement of letters-patent of the United States, No. 243,674, granted to the plaintiff, June 28, 1881, for an “improvement in sectional honey-frames,” on an application filed May 13, 1879.

The specification, claim, and drawings of the patent, are as follows:

“Be it known that I, James Forncrook, of Watertown, in the county of Jefferson and State of Wisconsin, have invented certain hew and useful improvements in sectional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fay v. CordesmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Dryfoos v. WieseSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fond Du Lac County v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hodgson v. VroomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. E. Van Noorden Co. v. Cheney Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  4. Francis v. Howard CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas · 1892
  5. Frank W. Butler and Catalina Yachts, Inc., a California Corporation v. Jack A. Helms, D/B/A Jack A. Helms CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API