Legal Opinion
E. Van Noorden Co. v. Cheney Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 27, 1934No. 2948PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal from interlocutory decrees by the District Court of Massachusetts ordering permanent injunctions and an accounting in a bill in equity involving the validity and infringement of certain patents for metal flashings used in building construction.
It was stipulated that the plaintiff is the sole owner of certain letters patent covering what is termed “interlocking through wall flashings,” No. 1,715,000, granted to Allan Cheney May 28, 1929, and No. 1,860,240, issued to Edmund H. Friedrich, granted May 24, 1932.
The type of flashing covered by the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Holtzer-Cabot Electric Co. v. Standard Electric Time Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Cheney Co. v. CunninghamDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- A. S. Boyle Co. v. Siegel Hardware & Paint Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
- Magic Fingers, Inc. v. AugerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.