Everett Gonzalez v. C. Gardemal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Everett Galindo Gonzalez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action alleging retaliation and due process violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 388, 341 (9th Cir.2010) (dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6)); Lukovsky v. City & County of San Francisco, 535 F.3d 1044, 1047 (9th Cir.2008) (statute of limitations). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The district court properly dismissed as time-barred Gonzalez’s retaliatory transfer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Brown v. ValoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Douglas v. NoelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Bruce v. YlstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- (PC) Sosa v. CSATF WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021