Legal Opinion
Hepting v. AT & T Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 20, 2006No. C-06-672 VRWPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs allege that AT & T Corporation (AT & T) and its holding company, AT & T Inc, are collaborating with the National Security Agency (NSA) in a massive warrantless surveillance program that illegally tracks the domestic and foreign communications and communication records of millions of Americans. The first amended complaint (Doc # 8(FAC)), filed on February 22, 2006, claims that AT & T and AT & T Inc have committed violations of:(1) The First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution (acting as agents or instruments of the government) by…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Abu AliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- American Civil Liberties Union v. National Security AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In re iPhone Application Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- In Re Facebook Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- United States ex rel. Parikh v. Citizens Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.