Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Berg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1928No. 20683. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant, the holder of twelve certain improvement district warrants issued by Kitsap county to defray the cost of the construction of what is known as Road No. 27, incorporated in local improvement dis trict No. 1, iii that county, instituted this action to enforce the collection of assessments levied by the county against the properties of respondents. The complaint alleged that the county treasurer had failed, neglected and refused to pay the warrants and that he neglected, refused and failed to promptly collect any of the assessments levied against the property of respondents.

The answer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stallcup v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Savage v. SternbergWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Street Grading Dist. No. 60 v. HagadornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Reed v. GormleyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Carlson v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henry v. Town of OakvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Johnson v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Denver Land Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Willard Gibson v. Marie-claire Harper PaghCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API