Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Kitsap County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. 17629PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— Respondents, as plaintiffs, began this action to enjoin Kitsap county and its treasurer from collecting certain special assessments levied against their property as its proportionate share of the cost of the construction, extension, and improvement' of a county road designated as county road No. 27, and known as the “Sheridan Road.” From a'decree setting aside the special assessments as to the plaintiffs in the action, and holding that the county acted without jurisdiction as to them in imposing the assessments complained of, the defendants have appealed.

The case was tried upon an agreed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wingate v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gregory v. Commissioners of Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Eggleston v. West Virginia Department of HighwaysWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cabell v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Elston v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Johnson v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API