Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Berg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1929No. 21447. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This action was instituted for the purpose of foreclosing against several tracts of real estate, in Kitsap county, the separate properties of the respective defendants, an alleged lien based upon local improvement warrants held by plaintiff, issued in payment of the cost of the construction of a county road.

A brief statement of the pertinent facts leading up to the bringing of this action is necessary to a proper understanding of the matters now before us for consideration. After the issuance of the warrants now held by plaintiff, the persons named as defendants herein instituted an action in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Chambers v. Hoover, Washington Territory1887
  3. Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. KnappWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Leaman v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Malloy v. BenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ankeny v. Pomeroy Grain Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Metropolitan Park District v. Olympia Athletic Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lidral Construction Co., Inc. v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Stusser v. GottsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ikola v. Snoqualmie Falls Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API