Legal Opinion
Homecare, Inc. v. Acquarulo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 15, 1995No. 13215PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendants appeal from the trial court’s judgment requiring the defendants to pay money damages to the plaintiff for home care services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendants’ mother. The trial court rendered judgment in accordance with findings of fact determined by an attorney fact finder pursuant to General Statutes § 52-549n.1 The defendants claim that (1) the trial court improperly accepted the fact finder’s findings of fact, and (2) the plaintiff’s action is barred by the statute of frauds, General Statutes § 52-550.2
The plaintiff filed an action seeking money damages for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Therrien v. Safeguard Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Rahmati v. MehriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- H. B. Toms Tree Surgery, Inc. v. BrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Douglass v. BrandtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sandella v. Dick Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Gould v. HallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Hart v. Mill Plain Autobody, No. Cv98 035 34 63 S (Dec. 3, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Silva v. New York Life Insurance Co., No. Cv97 034 29 73 S (Jan. 12, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001